Optimal terminal dimensionality reduction in Euclidean space

36Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Let ε ∈ (0, 1) and X ⊂ Rd be arbitrary with |X| having size n > 1. The Johnson-Lindenstrauss lemma states there exists f : X → Rm with m = O(ε−2 log n) such that ∀x ∈ X ∀y ∈ X, ∥x − y∥2 ≤ ∥ f (x) − f (y)∥2 ≤ (1 + ε)∥x − y∥2. We show that a strictly stronger version of this statement holds, answering one of the main open questions posed by Mahabadi et al. in STOC 2018: “∀y ∈ X” in the above statement may be replaced with “∀y ∈ Rd”, so that f not only preserves distances within X, but also distances to X from the rest of space. Previously this stronger version was only known with the worse bound m = O(ε−4 log n). Our proof is via a tighter analysis of (a specific instantiation of) the embedding recipe of Mahabadi et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Narayanan, S., & Nelson, J. (2019). Optimal terminal dimensionality reduction in Euclidean space. In Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (pp. 1064–1069). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313276.3316307

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free