A Comparison of Census and Cohort Sampling Models for the Longitudinal Collection of User-Reported Data in the Maternity Care Pathway: Mixed Methods Study

8Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Typical measures of maternity performance remain focused on the technical elements of birth, especially pathological elements, with insufficient measurement of nontechnical measures and those collected pre- and postpartum. New technologies allow for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) to be collected from large samples at multiple time points, which can be considered alongside existing administrative sources; however, such models are not widely implemented or evaluated. Since 2018, a longitudinal, personalized, and integrated user-reported data collection process for the maternal care pathway has been used in Tuscany, Italy. This model has been through two methodological iterations. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare and contrast two sampling models of longitudinal user-reported data for the maternity care pathway, exploring factors influencing participation, cost, and suitability of the models for different stakeholders. Methods: Data were collected by two modes: (1) "cohort" recruitment at the birth hospital of a predetermined sample size and (2) continuous, ongoing "census" recruitment of women at the first midwife appointment. Surveys were used to collect experiential and outcome data related to existing services. Women were included who passed 12 months after initial enrollment, meaning that they either received the surveys issued after that interval or dropped out in the intervening period. Data were collected from women in Tuscany, Italy, between September 2018 and July 2020. The total sample included 7784 individuals with 38,656 observations. The two models of longitudinal collection of user-reported data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, survival analysis, cost comparison, and a qualitative review. Results: Cohort sampling provided lower initial participation than census sampling, although very high subsequent response rates (87%) were obtained 1 year after enrollment. Census sampling had higher initial participation, but greater dropout (up to 45% at 1 year). Both models showed high response rates for online surveys. There were nonproportional dropout hazards over time. There were higher rates of dropout for women with foreign nationality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.88, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gilmore, K. J., Bonciani, M., & Vainieri, M. (2022). A Comparison of Census and Cohort Sampling Models for the Longitudinal Collection of User-Reported Data in the Maternity Care Pathway: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Medical Informatics, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.2196/25477

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free