Integration of basic and clinical science courses in US PharmD programs

31Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Objective. To determine the current status of and faculty perceptions regarding integration of basic and clinical science courses in US pharmacy programs. Methods. A 25-item survey instrument was developed and distributed to 132 doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) programs. Survey data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test. Thematic analysis of text-based comments was performed using the constant comparison method. Results. One hundred twelve programs responded for a response rate of 85%. Seventy-eight (70%) offered integrated basic and clinical science courses. The types of integration included: full integration with merging disciplinary contents (n525), coordinated delivery of disciplinary contents (n550), and standalone courses with integrated laboratory (n53). Faculty perceptions of course integration were positive. Themes that emerged from text-based comments included positive learning experiences as well as the challenges, opportunities, and skepticism associated with course integration. Conclusion. The results suggest wide variations in the design and implementation of integrated courses among US pharmacy programs. Faculty training and buy-in play a significant role in successful implementation of curricular integration.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Islam, M. A., Talukder, R. M., Taheri, R., & Blanchard, N. (2016). Integration of basic and clinical science courses in US PharmD programs. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 80(10). https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8010166

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free