Ofsted’s Curriculum research review for languages - what does this mean for language teachers, department leaders, curriculum design and professional development?

1Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Ofsted's (2021) Curriculum research review for languages (OCRR) draws conclusion on what ‘high-quality language education’ may look like. This opinion piece problematises the status of these conclusions as ‘features’ or recommendations. Before delving into a selection of identified ‘features’ in more depth, the author highlights the complexity of curriculum design and the interdependence between school-based curriculum design and the intended and assessed curricula. This leads to a critical analysis of ‘may’ statements that directly impact on language teachers, leaders of languages and their approach to curriculum design and pedagogy. These include progress-orientated curriculum design, language assessment and testing (including dictation), communicative strategies, target language and culture through authentic materials as well as transition issues. Furthermore, the opinion piece explores the potential implications the OCRR and its recommendations may have on initial teacher education, early career development and continuous professional development for teachers and leaders. The think piece concludes by calling for a collaborative approach and joint ownership by all stakeholders rather than putting all responsibility on language teachers and language leaders.

References Powered by Scopus

Language Teacher Supply: The Vicious Cycle, the Effects of the EU Referendum and Attempts to Solve Supply Shortage

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Koglbauer, R. (2022). Ofsted’s Curriculum research review for languages - what does this mean for language teachers, department leaders, curriculum design and professional development? Language Learning Journal, 50(2), 262–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2022.2045681

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

56%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

38%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 7

41%

Linguistics 6

35%

Arts and Humanities 2

12%

Psychology 2

12%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free