P118 Orthopaedic surgical interventions in a cohort of patients with hypermobility related disorders, compared with chronic pain syndrome patients in a tertiary referral centre

Abstract

Background: Mechanisms of pain associated with hypermobility are poorly understood and include nociceptive pain due to structural joint changes, neuropathic pain due to disrupted proprioception, muscle weakness and central sensitisation. The influence of anxiety and low mood is also unknown. There is limited published evidence regarding orthopaedic interventions in hypermobile patients particularly following the updated 2017 Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) classification criteria. We aimed to evaluate the characteristics of a hypermobility patient cohort who had received surgical interventions and compare these with a patient population with chronic pain syndromes. Methods: A retrospective analysis of medical records was conducted of patients attending a tertiary referral centre (University College London Hospital) between January 2018 and December 2018. A hypermobility-related disorders cohort was compared with a cohort of patients with chronic pain syndrome, including fibromyalgia (but without any evidence of hypermobility). Results: There were 350 patients (300 females, 50 males) in the hypermobility cohort with a mean age of 36 years (range 18-71 years) at time of clinic review. 63% had hypermobility spectrum disorder or hypermobility syndrome and 37% had EDS (hypermobile, classic, vascular and other rare types). 24% of hypermobile patients had undergone orthopaedic interventions. The Beighton score did not correlate with surgical procedures. 134 patients (121 females, 13 males) with chronic pain syndromes were identified, with a mean age of 51 years (range 26-85 years). 16% of chronic pain patients had received orthopaedic surgery. 76% of hypermobile patients who had orthopaedic interventions were under 50 years old, compared to 23% in the chronic pain cohort. The total number of surgical procedures in the hypermobility cohort was 227 (0.6485 interventions per patient) compared with 25 in the chronic pain cohort (0.1865 interventions per patient); relative risk 3.477 (95% CI 2.42-4.99; P<0.0001, chi-squared test). 33% of hypermobile patients had surgery on two or more joint groups (including 8 patients who had surgery in four or more joint groups), whereas 95% of chronic patients had surgery on only one joint group. In the hypermobile group the knee (23%) and hips (24%) were the most common site of operative intervention; however in the chronic pain cohort the most common sites were the knee (32%), spine (20%) and shoulders (20%), with only 4% requiring hip surgery. Conclusion: Patients with hypermobility have a greater number of surgical procedures at multiple joint sites and at a younger age than patients with chronic pain syndromes, suggesting that mechanical pathology (rather than pain alone) and anticipated surgical success may contribute to the need for surgical intervention. The Beighton score does not appear to be a reliable predictor of surgical intervention. Earlier diagnosis and a holistic, non-operative approach, including physiotherapy and pain management, may reduce the need for surgical procedures.