Towards a global virtual community of female engineering students and professionals: I. Impacts of grassroots international partnerships of student organizations on U.S. Engineering undergraduate cultural competency

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

From this study, we assert that the grassroots approach to creating an international partnership of student organizations is successful in achieving the important global competencies for engineering students. This approach gave more control to the tailor the program to drive the participants to achieve the desired effect of cultural competency. As evidenced by the PSOC framework, having an all female (SWE) camp introduced reasons for identification within the community and fostered a sense of belonging that made cultural differences less drastic, and fostered the motivation and connection. In addition, by priming the U.S. students for peer collaboration and establishing a flat camp structure where all of the students worked together to organize the camp, participants were able to more readily enter into and continue this international community.

References Powered by Scopus

Sense of community: A definition and theory

3830Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sense of community through Brunswik's lens: A first look

350Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Qualitative methods used in the assessment of engineering education

198Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reddivari, S., Dreyer, E. F. C., Rimer, S. P., & Cotel, A. (2016). Towards a global virtual community of female engineering students and professionals: I. Impacts of grassroots international partnerships of student organizations on U.S. Engineering undergraduate cultural competency. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2016-June). American Society for Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.27061

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 2

50%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

25%

Engineering 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free