The given, the pragmatic a priori, and scientific change

5Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this chapter, the historical and conceptual connections between Lewis and Kuhn are explored carefully and systematically. There is textual evidence that Kuhn was both directly and indirectly influenced by Lewis. Further parallels show that Lewis is committed to relativism about knowledge, but not about truth, as Kuhn was. Finally, it is argued that Lewis’s talk of “the given element in experience” would not be a problem for Kuhn, since the given only has an epistemic role insofar as it is conceptually interpreted, and interpretations are conceptually relative. Thus Lewis helps explicate the epistemological framework for Kuhn, whereas Kuhn shows the concrete implications of a Lewisian epistemology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mayoral, J. V. (2017). The given, the pragmatic a priori, and scientific change. In Pragmatism in Transition: Contemporary Perspectives on C.I. Lewis (pp. 79–101). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52863-2_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free