Comparison of the Mouse Bioassay and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Procedures for the Detection of Type A Botulinal Toxin in Food

61Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Samples of chili linked to a foodborne illness outbreak of type A botulism were examined for preformed type A botulinal toxin using two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) procedures and the mouse bioassay. One of the samples was positive for type A botulinal toxin and three of the samples were negative for type A, B, E, and F botulinal toxins using the three methods. The mouse bioassay indicated that type A toxin was present at the 10,000 minimal lethal dose per gram (MLD per g) of product. The ELISA tests indicated a toxicity of 7,650 MLD per g with one method and 8,350 MLD per g with the other method. The sample toxicity determined by the ELISA was estimated by comparing samples to a standard curve generated with standard type A neurotoxin in casein buffer. The ELISA methods are more rapid than the mouse bioassay, since the toxin type can be determined in 1 day. The mouse bioassay is more sensitive than the ELISA but usually requires multiple assays to obtain the toxin type and toxicity. Type A culture isolates from the sample were also verified using one ELISA method.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ferreira, J. L., Eliasberg, S. J., Edmonds, P., & Harrison, M. A. (2004). Comparison of the Mouse Bioassay and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Procedures for the Detection of Type A Botulinal Toxin in Food. Journal of Food Protection, 67(1), 203–206. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-67.1.203

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free