Identity, Structure, and Causal Representation in Scientific Models

10Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Recent debates over the nature of causation, casual inference, and the uses of causal models in counterfactual analysis, involving inter alia Nancy Cartwright (Hunting Causes and Using Them), James Woodward (Making Things Happen), and Judea Pearl (Causation), hinge on how causality is represented in models. Economists’ indigenous approach to causal representation goes back to the work of Herbert Simon with the Cowles Commission in the early 1950s. The paper explicates a scheme for the representation of causal structure, inspired by Simon, and shows how this representation sheds light on some important debates in the philosophy of causation. This structural account is compared to Woodward’s manipulability account. It is used to evaluate the recent debates – particularly, with respect to the nature of causal structure, the identity of causes, causal independence, and modularity. Special attention is given to modeling issues that arise in empirical economics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hoover, K. D. (2013). Identity, Structure, and Causal Representation in Scientific Models. In History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences (Vol. 3, pp. 35–57). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2454-9_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free