How to interpret randomised trials of test-treatment combinations: A critical evaluation of research on uterine Doppler test to predict, and aspirin to prevent, pre-eclampsia

8Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The methodology to evaluate either a test or treatment is well developed and understood. However, the design, conduct and interpretation of a combination of a test and a treatment in a single study are fraught with complexities. There are two distinct study designs to evaluate test-treatment combinations, with randomisation occurring either before or after the test. We present critical issues that need to be considered when evaluating and appraising test-treatment combinations, using the example of research on the uterine artery Doppler test to predict, and aspirin to prevent, pre-eclampsia. © RCOG 2010 BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fox, C., Khan, K., & Coomarasamy, A. (2010, June). How to interpret randomised trials of test-treatment combinations: A critical evaluation of research on uterine Doppler test to predict, and aspirin to prevent, pre-eclampsia. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02577.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free