Paper tape prevents foot blisters: A randomized prevention trial assessing paper tape in Endurance Distances II (Pre-TAPED II)

14Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether paper tape prevents foot blisters in multistage ultramarathon runners. Design: Multisite prospective randomized trial. Setting: The 2014 250-km (155-mile) 6-stage RacingThePlanet ultramarathons in Jordan, Gobi, Madagascar, and Atacama Deserts. Participants: One hundred twenty-eight participants were enrolled: 19 (15%) from the Jordan, 35 (27%) from Gobi, 21 (16%) from Madagascar, and 53 (41%) from the Atacama Desert. The mean age was 39.3 years (22-63) and body mass index was 24.2 kg/m 2 (17.4-35.1), with 31 (22.5%) females. Interventions: Paper tape was applied to a randomly selected foot before the race, either to participants' blister-prone areas or randomly selected location if there was no blister history, with untaped areas of the same foot used as the control. Main Outcome Measures: Development of a blister anywhere on the study foot. Results: One hundred six (83%) participants developed 117 blisters, with treatment success in 98 (77%) runners. Paper tape reduced blisters by 40% (P < 0.01, 95% confidence interval, 28-52) with a number needed to treat of 1.31. Most of the study participants had 1 blister (78%), with most common locations on the toes (n 58, 50%) and heel (n 27, 23%), with 94 (80%) blisters occurring by the end of stage 2. Treatment success was associated with earlier stages [odds ratio (OR), 74.9, P < 0.01] and time spent running (OR, 0.66, P 0.01). Conclusion: Paper tape was found to prevent both the incidence and frequency of foot blisters in runners.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lipman, G. S., Sharp, L. J., Christensen, M., Phillips, C., Ditullio, A., Dalton, A., … Krabak, B. J. (2016). Paper tape prevents foot blisters: A randomized prevention trial assessing paper tape in Endurance Distances II (Pre-TAPED II). In Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine (Vol. 26, pp. 362–368). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000000319

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free