Liver MRI and clinical findings to predict response after drug eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma

4Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To identify the gadoxetic acid (GA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and laboratory findings that enable prediction of treatment response and disease-free survival (DFS) after the first session of drug eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A total of 55 patients who underwent GA-enhanced MRI and DEB-TACE from January 2014 to December 2018 were included. All MRI features were reviewed by two radiologists. Treatment response was evaluated according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine predictive factors of treatment response and DFS, respectively. A total of 27 patients (49.1%) achieved complete response (CR) after one session of treatment. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of clinical and laboratory characteristics. Heterogeneous signal intensity in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) was the only independent predictor of non-CR (odds ratio, 4.807; p = 0.048). Recurrent HCC was detected in 19 patients (70.4%) after CR. In the multivariate analysis, elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level (≥ 30 ng/mL) was the only significant parameter associated with DFS (hazard ratio, 2.916; p = 0.040). This preliminary study demonstrated that heterogeneous signal intensity in the HBP and high serum AFP were useful predictive factors for poor treatment response and short DFS after DEB-TACE, respectively.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, J. Y., Lee, B. C., Kim, H. O., Heo, S. H., Shin, S. S., & Jeong, Y. Y. (2021). Liver MRI and clinical findings to predict response after drug eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma. Scientific Reports, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01839-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free