An alternative to the igneous crust fluid + sediment melt paradigm for arc lava geochemistry

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A long-standing paradigm of arc geochemistry is that the trace element compositions of arc lavas arise from two compositionally distinct slab components: an aqueous dehydration fluid from the subducting igneous ocean crust that transports “fluid-mobile” elements, such as barium (Ba), and a sediment melt that supplies thorium (Th) and the light rare earth elements. This two-component framework has been widely called upon to explain global geochemical trends as well as geochemical variations within individual arcs, such as the Marianas. Here, we show that this paradigm is inconsistent with mass balance, due to the low Ba contents of igneous ocean crust, and with experimental data, which show that aqueous fluids from the igneous oceanic crust would be too dilute to substantially affect arc compositions. Observations previously attributed to the sediment melt/igneous-crust-fluid hypothesis are better explained by diverse subducting sediment compositions coupled with ambient mantle wedge heterogeneity, both globally and for the Marianas.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Turner, S. J., & Langmuir, C. H. (2024). An alternative to the igneous crust fluid + sediment melt paradigm for arc lava geochemistry. Science Advances, 10(24). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adg6482

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free