Trial Consulting and Conflicts of Interest: An Introduction

  • Stolle D
  • Studebaker C
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Stolle and Studebaker begin with the observation that when social scientists enter the world of trial consulting, they also enter the highly regulated world of lawyers and courts and they are held to a similar high standard of conduct that applies to the lawyers whom they serve. Stolle and Studebaker focus on conflict of interest rules that likely apply to trial consultants, as well as work-product doctrine, and attorney client privilege. The chapter continues with a series of hypothetical scenarios that apply the rules to common situations that attorneys and their consultants may face in their professional capacities. The chapter ends with some discussion of the negligence liability that trial consultants who violate some of the strict rules of attorney conduct could come up against.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stolle, D. P., & Studebaker, C. A. (2011). Trial Consulting and Conflicts of Interest: An Introduction. In Handbook of Trial Consulting (pp. 351–369). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7569-0_16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free