How can we teach medical students to choose wisely? A randomised controlled cross-over study of video- versus text-based case scenarios

22Citations
Citations of this article
110Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The Choosing Wisely campaign highlights the importance of clinical reasoning abilities for competent and reflective physicians. The principles of this campaign should be addressed in undergraduate medical education. Recent research suggests that answering questions on important steps in patient management promotes knowledge retention. It is less clear whether increasing the authenticity of educational material by the inclusion of videos further enhances learning outcome. Methods: In a prospective randomised controlled cross-over study, we assessed whether repeated video-based testing is more effective than repeated text-based testing in training students to choose appropriate diagnostic tests, arrive at correct diagnoses and identify advisable therapies. Following an entry exam, fourth-year undergraduate medical students attended 10 weekly computer-based seminars during which they studied patient case histories. Each case contained five key feature questions (items) on the diagnosis and treatment of the presented patient. Students were randomly allocated to read text cases (control condition) or watch videos (intervention), and assignment to either text or video was switched between groups every week. Using a within-subjects design, student performance on video-based and text-based items was assessed 13 weeks (exit exam) and 9 months (retention test) after the first day of term. The primary outcome was the within-subject difference in performance on video-based and text-based items in the exit exam. Results: Of 125 eligible students, 93 provided data for all three exams (response rate 74.4%). Percent scores were significantly higher for video-based than for text-based items in the exit exam (76.2 ± 19.4% vs. 72.4 ± 19.1%, p = 0.026) but not the retention test (69.2 ± 20.2% vs. 66.4 ± 20.3%, p = 0.108). An additional Bayesian analysis of this retention test suggested that video-based training is marginally more effective than text-based training in the long term (Bayes factor 2.36). Regardless of presentation format, student responses revealed a high prevalence of erroneous beliefs that, if applied to the clinical context, could place patients at risk. Conclusion: Repeated video-based key feature testing produces superior short-term learning outcome compared to text-based testing. Given the high prevalence of misconceptions, efforts to improve clinical reasoning training in medical education are warranted. The Choosing Wisely campaign lends itself to being part of this process.

References Powered by Scopus

Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design

4055Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Power of Testing Memory: Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice

1482Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The critical importance of retrieval for learning

1315Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Training of clinical reasoning with a Serious Game versus small-group problem-based learning: A prospective study

45Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Use of 360° virtual reality video in medical obstetrical education: a quasi-experimental design

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Authentic learning in heathcare education: A systematic review

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ludwig, S., Schuelper, N., Brown, J., Anders, S., & Raupach, T. (2018). How can we teach medical students to choose wisely? A randomised controlled cross-over study of video- versus text-based case scenarios. BMC Medicine, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1090-y

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 29

60%

Researcher 12

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 33

63%

Nursing and Health Professions 11

21%

Social Sciences 4

8%

Psychology 4

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0