Influence of neural adjustments and muscle oxygenation on task failure during sustained isometric contractions with elbow flexor muscles

31Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study investigated the adjustments in muscle activation and oxygenation in biceps and triceps brachii during two tasks sustained to failure at 20 and 60% of the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) force. The tasks required participants either to push against a rigid restraint (force task) or to support an inertial load (position task) with the elbow flexor muscles. The surface EMG was recorded for biceps brachii, brachioradialis, triceps brachii and trapezius superior muscles. Muscle oxygenation of biceps and triceps brachii was measured by near-infrared spectroscopy. The position task was briefer (404 ± 159 s) than the force task (533 ± 194 s) when performed at 20% MVC (P= 0.011), but endurance time did not differ at 60% MVC (54 ± 19 versus 64 ± 16 s, respectively; P= 0.13). Biceps brachii oxygenation decreased slightly (by ∼7%) during tasks performed at 20% MVC, whereas it dropped (-40%) for tasks sustained at 60% MVC. However, the decrease in muscle oxygenation was not a significant predictor of time to failure at the two target forces, although its contribution to muscle fatigue cannot be completely ruled out at 60% MVC. In contrast, time to failure was predicted by the increase in EMG of biceps brachii for both tasks at 20% MVC, and EMG of brachioradialis and trapezius for both tasks at 60% MVC. These results suggest that neural adjustments rather than muscle oxygenation limited the time to failure for the force and position tasks at low and high target forces. © 2012 The Physiological Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Booghs, C., Baudry, S., Enoka, R., & Duchateau, J. (2012). Influence of neural adjustments and muscle oxygenation on task failure during sustained isometric contractions with elbow flexor muscles. Experimental Physiology, 97(8), 918–929. https://doi.org/10.1113/expphysiol.2011.064303

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free