Should radical evil be forgiven?

9Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Is evil an absolute difference that we must respond to with horror? Or is evil an aspect of humanity that we must approach with understanding? How we answer these questions partly determines how we should answer the question of whether we should forgive evil, particularly radical evil. Radical evil, as it is used it here, can be understood as evil that is not motivated by understandable human motives. Hannah Arendt argues that one cannot forgive radical evil because such acts completely transcend the human realm. Radical evil seems to be beyond our understanding. By contrast, Jacques Derrida argues that true forgiveness has nothing to do with measuring the extent of guilt, wrongdoing, remorse, apology, or healing. True forgiveness in this view involves forgiving the unforgivable, so forgiveness must be possible even in the most extreme cases, such as those of radical evil. © 2006 Humana Press Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

La Caze, M. (2006). Should radical evil be forgiven? In Forensic Psychiatry: Influences of Evil (pp. 273–293). Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-006-5_14

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free