The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the wellbeing of Irish Men's Shed members

21Citations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

COVID-19 disproportionately affects males especially those who are older and more socioeconomically disadvantaged. This study assessed wellbeing outcomes among men's shed members (Shedders) in Ireland at baseline (T1), 3 (T2), 6 (T3) and 12 months (T4) in response to a 10-week health promotion program 'Sheds for Life' (SFL). Two cohorts participated in SFL commencing in March and September 2019. This study compares the T3 findings from one cohort carried out during the COVID- 19 pandemic [COVID cohort (n=185)] with T3 findings from a comparator cohort [pre-COVID cohort (n=195)], completed pre-COVID-19. Questionnaires assessing wellbeing [life satisfaction, mental health, loneliness, physical activity (PA), self-rated health and other lifestyle measures] were analyzed in both cohorts T1, T2 and T3. Self-rated Health and life satisfaction decreased in the COVID cohort at T3 (p<0.001), while loneliness scores increased (p<0.0005). Higher loneliness scores were correlated with lower health ratings, life satisfaction and PA during COVID-19 (p<0.001). Days PA decreased in the COVID cluster at T3 from T2 (p<0.01) with those in urban areas reporting lower activity levels than rural areas (p<0.05). Those sufficiently active at baseline managed to maintain PA during COVID-19 while those not meeting guidelines were more likely to report decreases (p<0.001). Shedders experiencing COVID-19 restrictions are at an increased risk of poorer wellbeing and increased levels of loneliness. Support and guidance are needed to safely encourage this cohort back into men's sheds, settings that protect against loneliness and positively promote health and wellbeing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McGrath, A., Murphy, N., & Richardson, N. (2021). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the wellbeing of Irish Men’s Shed members. Health Promotion International, 36(4), 1007–1019. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaa113

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free