Influence of implant angulation and implant number on the accuracy of definitive casts

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: The present study determined the effect of implant angulation and implant number on the dimensional precision of implant definitive casts. Materials and Methods: Three definitive casts with implant analogs placed in a triangular pattern were made from dental stone. Group I was control group, Group II in which implant numbers 1 and 3 were at 5° convergence to the implant number 2. Group III in which implant numbers 1 and 3 are at 5° divergence to the implant number 2. Group IV in which implant numbers 1 and 3 are at 10° convergence to the implant number 2. Implant analogs were secured in all the definitive casts with cyanoacrylate. Three open tray impressions of the definitive cast were obtained and poured in Type IV dental stone. Coordinates in the three planes were measured at implant analog top surface and base of the cast using a fine tip measuring stylus. The data were aligned and angular differences between implant analog vectors from definitive and duplicate casts were measured. Results: There was a significant correlation between dental implant number and dental implant angulation (P < 0.05). There was a significant result when comparing the effect of the parallel group from 5° divergence and 10° convergence groups. A significant results while comparing the parallel group with 5° divergence and 10° convergence was obtained whereas while comparing 5° divergence, 5° divergence, and 10° convergence a nonsignificant difference was obtained (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Close proximity of implant angulation toward right-angled direction results in higher precision of implant.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Narayane, A., Shamsuddeen, S., Kharat, S., Rashidi, T., Pandav, A., & Thakur, M. (2021). Influence of implant angulation and implant number on the accuracy of definitive casts. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, 13(5), S367–S369. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_792_20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free