SARS-CoV-2 Serologic Immune Response in Exogenously Immunosuppressed Patients

13Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: While it is presumed that immunosuppressed patients, such as solid organ transplant recipients on immunosuppression, are at greater risk from SARS-CoV-2 infection than the general population, the antibody response to infection in this patient population has not been studied. Methods: In this report, we follow the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels in patients with COVID-19 who are undergoing exogenous immunosuppression. Specifically, we studied the antibody response of 3 solid organ transplant recipient patients, 3 patients who take daily inhaled fluticasone, and a patient on etanercept and daily inhaled fluticasone, and compared them to 5 patients not on exogenous immunosuppression. Results: We found that the solid organ transplant patients on full immunosuppression are at risk of having a delayed antibody response and poor outcome. We did not find evidence that inhaled steroids or etanercept predispose patients to delayed immune response to SARS-CoV-2. Conclusion: The data presented here suggest that solid organ transplant recipients may be good candidates for early targeted intervention against SARS-CoV-2.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zilla, M. L., Keetch, C., Mitchell, G., McBreen, J., Shurin, M. R., & Wheeler, S. E. (2021). SARS-CoV-2 Serologic Immune Response in Exogenously Immunosuppressed Patients. Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine, 6(2), 486–490. https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaa232

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free