The Monitoring and Evaluation of a Multicountry Surveillance Study, the Severe Typhoid Fever in Africa Program

3Citations
Citations of this article
70Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: There is limited information on the best practices for monitoring multicountry epidemiological studies. Here, we describe the monitoring and evaluation procedures created for the multicountry Severe Typhoid Fever in Africa (SETA) study. Methods: Elements from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) recommendations on monitoring clinical trials and data quality, respectively were applied in the development of the SETA monitoring plan. The SETA core activities as well as the key data and activities required for the delivery of SETA outcomes were identified. With this information, a list of key monitorable indicators was developed using on-site and centralized monitoring methods, and a dedicated monitoring team was formed. The core activities were monitored on-site in each country at least twice per year and the SETA databases were monitored centrally as a collaborative effort between the International Vaccine Institute and study sites. Monthly reports were generated for key indicators and used to guide risk-based monitoring specific for each country. Results: Preliminary results show that monitoring activities have increased compliance with protocol and standard operating procedures. A reduction in blood culture contamination following monitoring field visits in two of the SETA countries are preliminary results of the impact of monitoring activities. Conclusions: Current monitoring recommendations applicable to clinical trials and routine surveillance systems can be adapted for monitoring epidemiological studies. Continued monitoring efforts ensure that the procedures are harmonized across sites. Flexibility, ongoing feedback, and team participation yield sustainable solutions.

References Powered by Scopus

International organization for standardization (ISO) 15189

102Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Monitoring of clinical trials: Issues and recommendations

94Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Role and use of evidence in policymaking: An analysis of case studies from the health sector in Nigeria

41Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Typhoid and paratyphoid fever: A clinical seminar

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Incidence of typhoid fever in Burkina Faso, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Ghana, Madagascar, and Nigeria (the Severe Typhoid in Africa programme): a population-based study

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Development, confirmation, and application of a seeded Escherichia coli process control organism to validate Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi environmental surveillance methods

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mogeni, O. D., Cruz Espinoza, L. M., Im, J., Panzner, U., Toy, T., Pak, G. D., … Marks, F. (2019). The Monitoring and Evaluation of a Multicountry Surveillance Study, the Severe Typhoid Fever in Africa Program. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 69, S510–S518. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz597

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2406121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 22

58%

Researcher 12

32%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 12

44%

Nursing and Health Professions 6

22%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

22%

Social Sciences 3

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0