The case of "Judge Nodd" and other sleeping judges - Media, society, and judicial sleepiness

14Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Study Objectives: Review cases of judicial sleepiness and subsequent outcomes, including media and community attitudes. Design: Index case report and Internet search in English language at 2 recent time points. Participants: Index case and 14 other cases of judicial sleepiness reported on the internet Measurements: Qualitative review of media and Internet reports. Results: The index and other cases highlighted the role of the media seeking a punitive approach to occupational sleepiness, similar to that observed within the transport sector. In the index case, the judge's driver's license was withdrawn, despite official acknowledgement of effective treatment of sleep apnea. In 10 cases, judicial sleepiness resulted in a retrial and, in up to 5 cases, resulted in dismissal or retirement of the judge. In most cases, the cause of sleepiness was not determinable. Conclusion: Judicial sleepiness is not uncommon and is viewed negatively by the media, community, and judicial system. Active monitoring of the judiciary for sleepiness and sleep disorders is suggested.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grunstein, R. R., & Banerjee, D. (2007). The case of “Judge Nodd” and other sleeping judges - Media, society, and judicial sleepiness. Sleep, 30(5), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/30.5.625

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free