Harnessing indigenous social institutions for technology adoption: ‘Afoosha’ society of Ethiopia

13Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The search for effective mechanisms in technology adoption is high on the agenda of researchers and policy makers. In Ethiopia, adoption of technologies followed the diffusion of innovation information through public extension agents, cooperatives and their unions. The use of statutory channels evidenced to largely limit the innovation diffusion and the timely reach of technologies to the end user farmers for adoption due to their operational inefficiencies and bureaucracies emanating from statutory rules and regulations. This raises concerns how innovative ways of intermediating such technologies can be developed in a way that users trust and make informed decisions about the adoption of technologies. Thus, this study explains the roles of Afoosha social networks for technology uptake. Afoosha social network functions on the basis of orders in the predominant social capital, trustworthiness, altruism and with no self-centeredness. The existence of Afoosha social networks in the rural villages of Ethiopia would provide complementary pathways for effective diffusion of innovation and adoption of technologies. This study, therefore, generates a shred of evidence for the innovative mode of diffusing innovation concepts and adopting technologies that help to design policies that integrate the customary and statutory approaches for better technology adoption.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Get full text

Sustainability index analysis for environmentally low-input integrated farming

7Citations
131Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wedajo, D. Y., Belissa, T. K., & Jilito, M. F. (2019). Harnessing indigenous social institutions for technology adoption: ‘Afoosha’ society of Ethiopia. Development Studies Research, 6(1), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2019.1678187

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

50%

Researcher 8

36%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 14

67%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

14%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

10%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

10%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 116

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0