Separating random oracle proofs from complexity theoretic proofs: The non-committing encryption case

214Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We show that there exists a natural protocol problem which has a simple solution in the random-oracle (RO) model and which has no solution in the complexity-theoretic (CT) model, namely the problem of constructing a non-interactive communication protocol secure against adaptive adversaries a.k.a. non-interactive non-committing encryption. This separation between the models is due to the so-called programability of the random oracle. We show this by providing a formulation of the RO model in which the oracle is not programmable, and showing that in this model, there does not exist non-interactive non-committing encryption.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nielsen, J. B. (2002). Separating random oracle proofs from complexity theoretic proofs: The non-committing encryption case. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 2442, pp. 111–126). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45708-9_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free