Comparison of Mechanical Properties According to the Structural Materials of Lumber, GLT, CLT, and Ply-lam CLT

3Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The mechanical properties of materials such as lumber (L), glued laminated timber (GLT), cross-laminated timber (CLT), and Ply-lam CLT (P), which are laminated in cross layers, were compared. As a result, the modulus of elasticity (MOE) was 9.7 to 10.3 GPa, showing no significant difference between the materials. Modulus of rupture (MOR) of L and GLT showed higher strength than that of CLT and P. MOR of CLT and P was at the same level, and there was no difference in strength according to the plywood and lumber arranged alternately. Alternatively, there was a difference in the coefficient of variation of the materials, and CLT and P was 20.2% and 11.8%, respectively; therefore, uniform properties can be secured when using plywood. The compression strength showed the highest compression strength in the order of GLT, L, P, and CLT. P was failure by buckling+delamination, but other materials showed failure by only buckling. The adhesion of P passed the glulam standard (7.0 MPa), and the delamination ratio was very low at 0.41%. It can be used together with CLT. This study is expected to be used as basic data for establishing quality standards.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yang, S., Choi, G., Kim, J., Lee, H., & Kang, S. (2023). Comparison of Mechanical Properties According to the Structural Materials of Lumber, GLT, CLT, and Ply-lam CLT. BioResources, 18(4), 6971–6985. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.18.4.6971-6985

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free