Assessing Receptivity to Empirically Supported Treatments in Rape Crisis Centers

  • Edmond T
  • Voth Schrag R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Survivors of sexual violence are at risk for PTSD, depression, and anxiety. There are several empirically supported treatments (EST) that are effective for addressing these trauma symptoms; however, uptake of these ESTs among Rape Crisis Center (RCC) counselors is low. This research project sought to determine counselors’ attitudes toward evidence-based practices (EBPs); their perceptions of the intervention characteristics of three specific ESTs: Prolonged Exposure (PE), Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) and Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Therapy; and differences in attitudes and perceptions based on agency setting (urban/rural) and counselor education. The Consolidated Framework for Advancing Implementation Science (CFIR) was used to construct a web-based survey to send to all RCCs in Texas (n=83) resulting in an overall agency response rate of 72% (n=60) and responses from 76 counselors. Counselors’ attitudes towards EBP and perspectives on specific ESTs suggest that dissemination and implementation efforts are needed within the RCC service sector to advance the uptake of CPT, EMDR and PE.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Edmond, T. E., & Voth Schrag, R. (2017). Assessing Receptivity to Empirically Supported Treatments in Rape Crisis Centers. Advances in Social Work, 18(2), 611–629. https://doi.org/10.18060/21338

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free