Inferring strategies for sentence ordering in multidocument news summarization

246Citations
Citations of this article
97Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The problem of organizing information for multidocument summarization so that the generated summary is coherent has received relatively little attention. While sentence ordering for single document summarization can be determined from the ordering of sentences in the input article, this is not the case for multidocument summarization where summary sentences may be drawn from different input articles. In this paper, we propose a methodology for studying the properties of ordering information in the news genre and describe experiments done on a corpus of multiple acceptable orderings we developed for the task. Based on these experiments, we implemented a strategy for ordering information that combines constraints from chronological order of events and topical relatedness. Evaluation of our augmented algorithm shows a significant improvement of the ordering over two baseline strategies.

References Powered by Scopus

Use of MMR, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries

1996Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Learning to order things

465Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Automated discourse generation using discourse structure relations

179Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Survey of the state of the art in natural language generation: Core tasks, applications and evaluation

557Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Automatic summarization

381Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sentence fusion for multidocument news summarization

308Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barzilay, R., Elhadad, N., & McKeown, K. R. (2002). Inferring strategies for sentence ordering in multidocument news summarization. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 17, 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.991

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘240481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 43

63%

Researcher 16

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 58

75%

Engineering 8

10%

Linguistics 8

10%

Arts and Humanities 3

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0