The theoretical and empirical rate of convergence for geometric branch-and-bound methods

26Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Geometric branch-and-bound solution methods, in particular the big square small square technique and its many generalizations, are popular solution approaches for non-convex global optimization problems. Most of these approaches differ in the lower bounds they use which have been compared empirically in a few studies. The aim of this paper is to introduce a general convergence theory which allows theoretical results about the different bounds used. To this end we introduce the concept of a bounding operation and propose a new definition of the rate of convergence for geometric branch-and-bound methods. We discuss the rate of convergence for some well-known bounding operations as well as for a new general bounding operation with an arbitrary rate of convergence. This comparison is done from a theoretical point of view. The results we present are justified by some numerical experiments using the Weber problem on the plane with some negative weights. © 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schöbel, A., & Scholz, D. (2010). The theoretical and empirical rate of convergence for geometric branch-and-bound methods. Journal of Global Optimization, 48(3), 473–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-009-9502-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free