What do senior physicians think about AI and clinical decision support systems: Quantitative and qualitative analysis of data from specialty societies

31Citations
Citations of this article
99Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims The aim was to help physicians engage with NHS and other policymakers about the use, procurement and regulation of artificial intelligence, algorithms and clinical decision support systems (CDSS) in the NHS by identifying the professional benefits of and concerns about these systems. Methods We piloted a three-page survey instrument with closed and open-ended questions on SurveyMonkey, then circulated it to specialty societies via email. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were used to analyse responses. Results The results include the current usage of CDSS; identified benefits; concerns about quality; concerns about regulation, professional practice, ethics and liability, as well as actions being taken by the specialty societies to address these; and aspects of CDSS quality that need to be tested. Conclusion While results confirm many expected benefits and concerns about CDSS, they raise new professional concerns and suggest further actions to explore with partners on behalf of the physician community.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Petkus, H., Hoogewerf, J., & Wyatt, J. C. (2020). What do senior physicians think about AI and clinical decision support systems: Quantitative and qualitative analysis of data from specialty societies. Clinical Medicine, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 20(3), 324–328. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmed.2019-0317

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free