Re-positioning power and re-imagining reflexivity: Examining positionality and building validity through reconstructive horizon analysis

13Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this chapter, we explore how researchers might engage in reflexivity. Reflexivity is closely related to the concept of positionality, which refers to the way we as researchers view our position in the world in relation to others, especially those who are involved in or may read our research. Often reflexivity is issued as a call-an important step to take to establish the validity, rigor, or ethical nature of the research being done. Here we engage in reconstructive horizon analysis (RHA), which is an approach for examining taken-for-granted claims made by ourselves and our research participants. We find that by engaging in RHA, we build moments for dialogue and communication into the research process that allow assumptions, structures, and roles to be made explicit.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Call-Cummings, M., & Ross, K. (2019). Re-positioning power and re-imagining reflexivity: Examining positionality and building validity through reconstructive horizon analysis. In Research Methods for Social Justice and Equity in Education (pp. 3–13). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05900-2_1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free