Students’ sensemaking of synthesis physics problems: an exploration of their eye fixations

2Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We investigate students’ eye movements when they solve sequential and simultaneous synthesis physics problems. In sequential synthesis problems, multiple events occur chronologically, whereas in simultaneous synthesis problems, multiple events take place concurrently. We captured students’ eye fixations on each problem diagram and recorded their verbal descriptions of problem-solving approaches. Results indicate that for sequential synthesis tasks, students fixated heavily and frequently on regions of a diagram where information is unknown or on empty space related to future events. Further, most students could invoke all relevant principles and intermediate variables to solve the sequential problems. However, for simultaneous synthesis tasks, students prioritised aspects of the diagram where information is given in the problem statement. Moreover, they mostly invoked only one fundamental principle to solve the problems by either using the values given in the statement or identifying one relevant intermediate variable. These findings may be explained by the differences in the spatiotemporal occurrence of the multiple events in the two types of synthesis problem. The chronological events in sequential synthesis tasks seem to support students’ sensemaking, but the concurrent events of simultaneous synthesis tasks do not.

References Powered by Scopus

Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of Research

5915Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning

4926Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension

2849Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Evaluating the Feasibility of Predicting Information Relevance During Sensemaking with Eye Gaze Data

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Top-down and bottom-up effects on visual perception during data-based scientific reasoning in the context of population dynamics

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ibrahim, B., & Ding, L. (2023). Students’ sensemaking of synthesis physics problems: an exploration of their eye fixations. International Journal of Science Education, 45(9), 734–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2175183

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

60%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

20%

Researcher 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Physics and Astronomy 3

50%

Computer Science 1

17%

Social Sciences 1

17%

Engineering 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0