We present new careful semantics within Dung's theory of argumentation. Under such careful semantics, two arguments cannot belong to the same extension whenever one of them indirectly attacks a third argument while the other one indirectly defends the third. We argue that our semantics lead to a better handling of controversial arguments than Dung's ones in some settings. We compare the careful inference relations induced by our semantics w.r.t. cautiousness; we also compare them with the inference relations induced by Dung's semantics. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005.
CITATION STYLE
Coste-Marquis, S., Devred, C., & Marquis, P. (2005). Inference from controversial arguments. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 3835 LNAI, pp. 606–620). https://doi.org/10.1007/11591191_42
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.