Developing live vaccines against Yersinia pestis

33Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Three great plague pandemics caused by the gram-negative bacterium Yersinia pestis have killed nearly 200 million people and it has been linked to biowarfare in the past. Plague is endemic in many parts of the world. In addition, the risk of plague as a bioweapon has prompted increased research to develop plague vaccines against this disease. Injectable subunit vaccines are being developed in the United States and United Kingdom. However, the live attenuated Y. pestis-EV NIIEG strain has been used as a vaccine for more than 70 years in the former Soviet Union and in some parts of Asia and provides a high degree of efficacy against plague. This vaccine has not gained general acceptance because of safety concerns. In recent years, modern molecular biological techniques have been applied to Y. pestis to construct strains with specific defined mutations designed to create safe, immunogenic vaccines with potential for use in humans and as bait vaccines to reduce the load of Y. pestis in the environment. In addition, a number of live, vectored vaccines have been reported using attenuated viral vectors or attenuated Salmonella strains to deliver plague antigens. Here we summarize the progress of live attenuated vaccines against plague. © 2011 Sun et al.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

1583Citations
900Readers

This article is free to access.

1042Citations
860Readers

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sun, W., Roland, K. L., & Curtiss, R. (2011). Developing live vaccines against Yersinia pestis. Journal of Infection in Developing Countries. Journal of Infection in Developing Countries. https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.2030

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

67%

Researcher 4

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10

48%

Medicine and Dentistry 6

29%

Immunology and Microbiology 3

14%

Social Sciences 2

10%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0