Science-based health innovation in Ghana: Health entrepreneurs point the way to a new development path

11Citations
Citations of this article
144Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Science, technology and innovation have long played a role in Ghanas vision for development, including in improving its health outcomes. However, so far little research has been conducted on Ghanas capacity for health innovation to address local diseases. This research aims to fill that gap, mapping out the key actors involved, highlighting examples of indigenous innovation, setting out the challenges ahead and outlining recommendations for strengthening Ghanas health innovation system. Methods. Case study research methodology was used. Data were collected through reviews of academic literature and policy documents and through open-ended, face-to-face interviews with 48 people from across the science-based health innovation system. Data was collected over three visits to Ghana from February 2007 to August 2008, and stakeholders engaged subsequently. Results. Ghana has strengths which could underpin science-based health innovation in the future, including health and biosciences research institutions with strong foreign linkages and donor support; a relatively strong regulatory system which is building capacity in other West African countries; the beginnings of new funding forms such as venture capital; and the return of professionals from the diaspora, bringing expertise and contacts. Some health products and services are already being developed in Ghana by individual entrepreneurs, which are innovative in the sense of being new to the country and, in some cases, the continent. They include essential medicines, raw pharmaceutical materials, new formulations for pediatric use and plant medicines at various stages of development. Conclusions. While Ghana has many institutions concerned with health research and its commercialization, their ability to work together to address clear health goals is low. If Ghana is to capitalize on its assets, including political and macroeconomic stability which underpin investment in health enterprises, it needs to improve the health innovation environment through increasing support for its small firms; coordinating policies; and beginning a dialogue with donors on how health research can create locally-owned knowledge and be more demand-driven. Mobilizing stakeholders around health product development areas, such as traditional medicines and diagnostics, would help to create trust between groups and build a stronger health innovation system. © 2010 Al-Bader et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

Efficacy of the RTS,S/AS02A vaccine against Plasmodium falciparum infection and disease in young African children: Randomised controlled trial

673Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Duration of protection with RTS,S/AS02A malaria vaccine in prevention of Plasmodium falciparum disease in Mozambican children: Single-blind extended follow-up of a randomised controlled trial

338Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Endosymbiotic bacteria in worms as targets for a novel chemotherapy in filariasis

276Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Health research capacity development in low and middle income countries: Reality or rhetoric? A systematic meta-narrative review of the qualitative literature

235Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Investing in health r&d: Where we are, what limits us, and how to make progress in africa

85Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bioinformatics in Africa: The Rise of Ghana?

46Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Al-Bader, S., Daar, A. S., & Singer, P. A. (2010). Science-based health innovation in Ghana: Health entrepreneurs point the way to a new development path. BMC International Health and Human Rights, 10(SUPPL. 1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-698X-10-S1-S2

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 54

59%

Researcher 16

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 11

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 10

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 25

34%

Medicine and Dentistry 19

26%

Business, Management and Accounting 18

24%

Nursing and Health Professions 12

16%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0