Clinicopathological difference and survival impact of patients with c-sclc and sclc

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Combined small cell lung cancer (c-SCLC) distinguishes itself from small cell lung cancer (SCLC) due to its inclusion of both SCLC and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) components. Few studies have compared clinicopathological characteristics, prognosis and factors affecting survival. We therefore addressed the issues in this study. Patients and Methods: A total of 400 c-SCLC and 20,841 SCLC patients were enrolled using SEER database. Difference in clinicopathological characteristics of SCLC and c-SCLC patients was analyzed using chi-square. Kaplan–Meier was applied to compare their survival before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Cox regression model was adopted to assess the impact of different clinical variables on survival. Logistic regression was applied to identify risk factors for c-SCLC and SCLC patients. Results: Differences in race, sex, T stage, N stage, surgery, bone, brain and liver metastasis were detected between c-SCLC and SCLC patients. c-SCLC patients had better overall survival (OS) than SCLC patients before PSM. Age, race, sex, T stage, N stage, surgery, bone, brain, liver and lung metastasis were prognostic factors affecting OS for c-SCLC and SCLC (P < 0.05). However, a significant OS benefit was not observed in c-SCLC after adjusting for clinicopathological variables (HR, 0.950; 95% CI, 0.842–1.073; P=0.411). No significant OS difference was found between c-SCLC and SCLC patients after PSM (P = 0.789). c-SCLC patients had lower risk of lymph node (OR: 0.555; 95% CI: 0.439–0.703; P < 0.001) and liver metastasis (OR: 0.591; 95% CI: 0.448–0.779; P < 0.001), whereas had no significant differences in bone and brain metastasis risks (P > 0.05) compared with SCLC patients. Conclusion: The prognosis of c-SCLC did not significantly differ from that of SCLC if clinicopathological characteristics are controlled. Better prognosis for c-SCLC patients over SCLC patients may be ascribed to fewer liver and lymph node metastases upon diagnosis.

References Powered by Scopus

Changing epidemiology of small-cell lung cancer in the United States over the last 30 years: Analysis of the surveillance, epidemiologic, and end results database

1647Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Lung cancer in elderly patients: An analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database

512Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC): A clinicopathologic study of 100 cases with surgical specimens

382Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Model development and validation for predicting small-cell lung cancer bone metastasis utilizing diverse machine learning algorithms based on the SEER database

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clinical features and prognostic factors of IV combined small cell lung cancer: A propensity score matching analysis

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rare Combined Small Cell Lung Carcinoma and Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma Response to PD-1 Inhibitor as Third-Line Therapy: A Case Report

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, C., Shang, X., Sun, J., Li, Z., Lin, J., Zhao, C., & Wang, H. (2021). Clinicopathological difference and survival impact of patients with c-sclc and sclc. International Journal of General Medicine, 14, 6899–6906. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S332725

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 1

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0