Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Under 50 Years of Age: A Demographic and Treatment Outcome Study at Five Years Follow-Up

  • Banskota B
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: The indications for a total hip arthroplasty have expanded to younger, higher-demand patients with the advances and availability of durable biomaterials and improved accuracy and surgical techniques of prosthesis implantation. We present our data on the mid-term (five years) follow-up of a cohort of younger patients who underwent THA at our institution. Methodology: A retrospective study with prospective measurement of functional and patient satisfaction outcomes was conducted for patients under 50 years of age who had undergone a primary THA for any cause from 2010 to 2020. Study variables included demographic profile, etiology, prosthesis details, pre-and post-Harris Hip Scores (HHS), and the short-form SF-12 questionnaire. Results: Of 206 THAs performed during the study period, 62 (30.09%) THAs met the inclusion criteria. There were 60 patients with 62 hips, including 38 (63.33%) males and 22 (36.67%) females. The mean age was 39.2±7.92 years. The mean pre-operative HHS was 40.10±5.96. The mean follow-up period was 5.14±2.57 years. At the final evaluation, the mean HHS was 90.42±6.35, and SF-12 scores for physical (PS) and mental (MS) domains were 46.98±5.76 and 54.22±4.35, respectively. The HHS was excellent in 45 (72.58%) hips, good in 13 (20.96%) hips, fair in 2 (3.23%) hips, and poor in 2 (3.23%) hips. Conclusion: Good to excellent functional results were seen in 94% of patients at five years follow-up. Uncemented prostheses and ceramic-on-polyethylene bearing surfaces were preferred. Keywords: Adult, Arthroplasty, Hip, Replacement

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Banskota, B. (2023). Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Under 50 Years of Age: A Demographic and Treatment Outcome Study at Five Years Follow-Up. Nepal Orthopaedic Association Journal, 15–18. https://doi.org/10.59173/noaj.20230902e

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free