Evaluating concentrated flowpaths in riparian forest buffer contributing areas using LiDAR imagery and topographic metrics

26Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Riparian forest (CP22) buffers are implemented in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed to trap pollutants in surface runoffthus minimizing the amount of pollutants entering the stream network. For these buffers to function effectively, overland flow must enter the riparian zones as dispersed sheet flow to facilitate slowing, filtering, and infiltrating of surface runoff. The occurrence of concentrated flowpaths, however, is prevalent across the watershed. Concentrated flowpaths limit buffer filtration capacity by channeling overland flow through or around buffers. In this study, two topographic metrics (topographic openness and flow accumulation) were used to evaluate the occurrence of concentrated flowpaths and to derive effective CP22 contributing areas in four Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) watersheds within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. The study watersheds include the Tuckahoe Creek watershed (TCW) located in Maryland, and the Spring Creek (SCW), Conewago Creek (CCW) and Mahantango Creek (MCW) watersheds located in Pennsylvania. Topographic openness identified detailed topographic variation and critical source areas in the lower relief areas while flow accumulation was better at identifying concentrated flowpaths in higher relief areas. Results also indicated that concentrated flowpaths are prevalent across all four watersheds, reducing CP22 effective contributing areas by 78% in the TCW, 54% in the SCW, 38% in the CCW and 22% in the MCW. Thus, to improve surface water quality within the Chesapeake BayWatershed, the implementation of riparian forest buffers should be done in such a way as to mitigate the effects of concentrated flowpaths that continue to short-circuit these buffers.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Location of the study watersheds relative to the Chesapeake Bay Watershed: Spring Creek (SCW), Mahantango Creek (MCW), Conewago Creek (CCW) and Tuckahoe Creek (TCW) watersheds.
  • Figure 2. Contributing area restricted to the riparian forest (CP22) buffer by erasing a portion of the CP22 buffer that is intersected by the stream network.
  • Figure 3. A comparison of the LiDAR-derived digital elevation model (DEM) and the System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses (SAGA) Topographic Openness.
  • Figure 4. Examples of potential topographic (TCA) and effective (ECA) contributing areas for riparian forest (CP22) buffers in TCW (A), MCW (B), SCW (C) and CCW (D) watersheds.
  • Figure 5. Map of topographic openness for riparian forest (CP22) buffers contributing areas in TCW (A), MCW (B), SCW (C) and CCW (D).
  • Figure 6. Maps of flow accumulation for riparian forest (CP22) buffers contributing areas in TCW (A), MCW (B), SCW (C) and CCW (D).
  • Table 1. Summary of riparian buffer analysis in the Tuckahoe Creek (TCW), Spring Creek (SCW), Conewago Creek (CCW), and Mahantango Creek (MCW) watersheds.
  • Figure 7. A close-up of hydrologic features such as berms and ditches identified using topographic openness.

References Powered by Scopus

System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses (SAGA) v. 2.1.4

1921Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models

1873Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Meta-analysis of nitrogen removal in riparian buffers

496Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The Chesapeake Bay program modeling system: Overview and recommendations for future development

46Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Wetness index based on landscape position and topography (WILT): Modifying TWI to reflect landscape position

44Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Runoff, soil loss, and sources of particulate organic carbon delivered to streams by sugarcane and riparian areas: An isotopic approach

36Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wallace, C. W., McCarty, G., Lee, S., Brooks, R. P., Veith, T. L., Kleinman, P. J. A., & Sadeghi, A. M. (2018). Evaluating concentrated flowpaths in riparian forest buffer contributing areas using LiDAR imagery and topographic metrics. Remote Sensing, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040614

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

60%

Researcher 8

32%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 13

62%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

29%

Computer Science 1

5%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 1

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 5

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0