REPRESENT: REPresentativeness of RESearch data obtained through the ‘General Informed ConsENT’

0Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: We assessed potential consent bias in a cohort of > 40,000 adult patients asked by mail after hospitalization to consent to the use of past, present and future clinical and biological data in an ongoing ‘general consent’ program at a large tertiary hospital in Switzerland. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, all adult patients hospitalized between April 2019 and March 2020 were invited to participate to the general consent program. Demographic and clinical characteristics were extracted from patients’ electronic health records (EHR). Data of those who provided written consent (signatories) and non-responders were compared and analyzed with R studio. Results: Of 44,819 patients approached, 10,299 (23%) signed the form. Signatories were older (median age 54 [IQR 38–72] vs. 44 years [IQR 32–60], p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bosmani, C., Carboni, S., Samer, C., Lovis, C., Perneger, T., Huttner, A., & Hirschel, B. (2023). REPRESENT: REPresentativeness of RESearch data obtained through the ‘General Informed ConsENT.’ BMC Medical Ethics, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00877-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free