MP61-08 COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PROPHYLACTIC MESH PLACEMENT FOR PREVENTION OF PARASTOMAL HERNIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ILEAL CONDUIT URINARY DIVERSION FOR BLADDER CANCER

  • Kanabolo* D
  • Park S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Long-term studies have shown that parastomal hernias (PH) occur in more than half of all stomas. Mesh prophylaxis has been shown to reduce PH after end-colostomy and ileal conduits. However, no cost-effectiveness studies on mesh prophylaxis have been performed for this population. Thus, our objective was to determine whether mesh prophylaxis to prevent PH is cost-effective in patients undergoing ileal conduit urinary diversion for bladder cancer. METHOD(S): We created a Markov model on the costs and effectiveness of mesh prophylaxis for patients undergoing radical cystectomy with a time horizon of 5 years. Costs were obtained from the literature and adjusted to 2018 US dollars. Effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALY). 1- and 2-way sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of our model. RESULT(S): In patients with stage I to IV bladder cancer, prophylactic mesh placement was a costlier, but more effective strategy compared with no mesh placement at index surgery. On average, incremental cost between the two strategies across all stages was $888.78 in favor of no mesh placement. Incremental effectiveness averaged 0.49 additional QALY across all stages. This resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $1,814/QALY. The ICER increased with stage, from $1,418/QALY in Stage I to $3,497/QALY at Stage IV. With a willingness to pay of $50,000/QALY, mesh prophylaxis may be deemed cost-effective. On sensitivity analysis, the decision to place mesh was sensitive to the probability of mesh infection, whereas the cost of the mesh did not influence cost effectiveness. CONCLUSION(S): In patients undergoing ileal conduit urinary diversion for bladder cancer, mesh prophylaxis at the time of radical cystectomy is a highly cost-effective strategy in preventing PH for patients presenting with all stages of bladder cancer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kanabolo*, D., & Park, S. (2019). MP61-08 COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PROPHYLACTIC MESH PLACEMENT FOR PREVENTION OF PARASTOMAL HERNIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ILEAL CONDUIT URINARY DIVERSION FOR BLADDER CANCER. Journal of Urology, 201(Supplement 4). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000556810.58781.e9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free