Approaches to Corruption: a Synthesis of the Scholarship

28Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The scholarly literature on corruption has developed in separate disciplines, each of which has produced important insights, but each of which also has some crucial limitations. We bring these existing approaches together, and then we confront them against an ethnographic literature on corruption that over the last two decades has become extensive, but has never before been synthesized into an overarching framework. We argue that any corruption reform must meet three challenges. First, corruption persists because people need to engage in corruption to meet their needs. This is the resource challenge. Second, corruption persists because there is uncertainty over what constitutes a gift and what constitutes a bribe, as well as confusion over what is private and what is public. This is the definitional challenge. And third, corruption persists because of pressure to behave in ways that are considered moral according to alternative criteria, such as taking care of one’s kin, or standing up to legacies of racism and oppression. This is the alternative moralities challenge. We examine the strengths and weaknesses of existing approaches to corruption in meeting these three challenges.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Prasad, M., Martins da Silva, M. B., & Nickow, A. (2019, March 15). Approaches to Corruption: a Synthesis of the Scholarship. Studies in Comparative International Development. Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-018-9275-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free