KIT exon 10 variant (c.1621 A > C) single nucleotide polymorphism as predictor of GIST patient outcome

15Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Tumor genotype plays a crucial role in clinical management of GIST. Whether genetic polymorphism of KIT may influence GIST patient outcome is unclear. Methods: We investigated the biological and clinical significance of the presence of KIT exon 10 variant (c.1621 A > C), KIT L541, in a transfected cell line (3 T3 L541) and in two retrospectively collected series of 109 GIST patients in total. The control group consisted of 60 healthy donors collected at the French department of blood transfusion. Results: In the 3 T3 L541 cell line, KITL541 protein exhibited a spontaneous phosphorylation status comparable to that of wild-type KIT but displayed a phosphorylation pattern of AKT and ERK1/2 that was found similar to that of the classical mutated forms of the KIT receptor. Of 109 patients enrolled in this retrospective translational research study, 24 (22 %) harboured KIT L541, similarly to the control group of healthy donors (n = 10 of 60, 17 %). A higher prevalence of the variant KIT L541 was observed in patients with metastatic status at diagnosis (KIT L541 correlated nine of 22 versus 15 of 87, p = 0.02). In addition, patients with KIT L541 and localized GIST had a higher rate of relapse at 5 years and lower relapse free survival at 5 years in univariate, as well as in multivariate analysis. Response rate and duration of response to imatinib was similar in KIT L541 and KIT M541 patients. Conclusion:KIT L541 genotype is associated with a higher risk of metastasis at diagnosis and a higher risk of relapse in GIST patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brahmi, M., Alberti, L., Dufresne, A., Ray-Coquard, I., Cassier, P., Meeus, P., … Blay, J. Y. (2015). KIT exon 10 variant (c.1621 A > C) single nucleotide polymorphism as predictor of GIST patient outcome. BMC Cancer, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1817-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free