Methodological Aspects of Multicenter Studies with Quantitative PET

17Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Quantification of whole-body FDG PET studies is affected by many physiological and physical factors. Much of the variability in reported standardized uptake value (SUV) data seen in the literature results from the variability in methodology applied among these studies, i.e., due to the use of different scanners, acquisition and reconstruction settings, region of interest strategies, SUV normalization, and/or corrections methods. To date, the variability in applied methodology prohibits a proper comparison and exchange of quantitative FDG PET data. Consequently, the promising role of quantitative PET has been demonstrated in several monocentric studies, but these published results cannot be used directly as a guideline for clinical (multicenter) trials performed elsewhere. In this chapter, the main causes affecting whole-body FDG PET quantification and strategies to minimize its inter-institute variability are addressed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boellaard, R. (2011). Methodological Aspects of Multicenter Studies with Quantitative PET. In Methods in Molecular Biology (Vol. 727, pp. 335–349). Humana Press Inc. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-062-1_18

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free