Using PET/CT bone scan dynamic data to evaluate tibia remodeling when a taylor spatial frame is used: Short and longer term differences

3Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Eighteen consecutive patients, treated with a Taylor Spatial Frame for complex tibia conditions, gave their informed consent to undergo Na 18 F - PET/CT bone scans. We present a Patlak-like analysis utilizing an approximated blood time-activity curve eliminating the need for blood aliquots. Additionally, standardized uptake values (SUV) derived from dynamic acquisitions were compared to this Patlak-like approach. Spherical volumes of interest (VOIs) were drawn to include broken bone, other (normal) bone, and muscle. The SUV m (t) (m = m a x, mean) and a series of slopes were computed as (SUV m (t i) - SUV m (t j)) / (t i - t j), for pairs of time values t i and t j. A Patlak-like analysis was performed for the same time values by computing ((VOI p (t i) / VOI e (t i)) - (VOI p (t j) / VOI e (t j))) / (t i - t j), where p = broken bone, other bone, and muscle and e = expected activity in a VOI. Paired comparisons between Patlak-like and SUV m slopes showed good agreement by both linear regression and correlation coefficient analysis (r = 84 %, r s = 78 % - SUV max, r = 92 %, and r s = 91 % - SUV mean), suggesting static scans could substitute for dynamic studies. Patlak-like slope differences of 0.1 min -1 or greater between examinations and SU V max differences of 5 usually indicated good remodeling progress, while negative Patlak-like slope differences of -0.06 min -1 usually indicated poor remodeling progress in this cohort.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lundblad, H., Maguire, G. Q., Karlsson-Thur, C., Jonsson, C., Noz, M. E., Zeleznik, M. P., … Weidenhielm, L. (2015). Using PET/CT bone scan dynamic data to evaluate tibia remodeling when a taylor spatial frame is used: Short and longer term differences. BioMed Research International, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/574705

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free