The benefits of spatially differentiated regulation: The response to acid rain by U.S. States prior to the acid rain program

4Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Location is a crucial driver of both the marginal abatement and damage costs of sulfur dioxide emissions by U.S. coal-fired power plants. Before the start of the Acid Rain Program in 1995, old boilers were subject to emission rate standards set by individual states. We investigate how individual states adjusted their sulfur regulation laws in response to acid rain, and whether they accounted for differences in marginal abatement costs, vulnerability to agricultural damages, special industry interests, or inter-state externalities. The welfare gain compared to a uniform reduction in emission rate standards is estimated to be $21 million (in 1995 dollars) annually. © 2013 The Author (2013). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Perino, G., & Talavera, O. (2014). The benefits of spatially differentiated regulation: The response to acid rain by U.S. States prior to the acid rain program. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 96(1), 108–123. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aat084

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free