Erratum: The academic reading format international study (ARFIS): Investigating students around the world (Communications in Computer and Information Science, (2016), 676, (215-227) 10.1007/978-3-319-52162-6_21)

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The original chapter was published in Communications in Computer and Information Science 2016, 676, pp. 215-227. After publication of the original paper [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/ 978-3-319-52162-6_21] it came to the authors’ attention that the Chinese translation of question 10: I prefer electronic textbooks over print textbooks, was inverted to read I prefer print textbooks over electronic textbooks. Therefore, Figure 3 and the related discussions on pages 220-221 and 227 were incorrect. (Figure Presented) Electronic textbooks. With more libraries investing in electronic textbooks, it is important to understand our students’ attitudes towards using them. Overall, nearly 69% of the students disagreed with preferring e-textbooks. Figure 3 shows amalgamated results and country percentages for Question 10.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Erratum: The academic reading format international study (ARFIS): Investigating students around the world (Communications in Computer and Information Science, (2016), 676, (215-227) 10.1007/978-3-319-52162-6_21). (2017). Communications in Computer and Information Science. Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52162-6_72

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free