Point-of-Care Hemostatic Testing in Cardiac Surgery

  • Karkouti K
  • Callum J
  • Wijeysundera D
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Cardiac surgery is frequently complicated by coagulopathic bleeding that is difficult to optimally manage using standard hemostatic testing. We hypothesized that point-of-care hemostatic testing within the context of an integrated transfusion algorithm would improve the management of coagulopathy in cardiac surgery and thereby reduce blood transfusions. Methods: We conducted a pragmatic multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial of a point-of-care-based transfusion algorithm in consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass at 12 hospitals from October 6, 2014, to May 1, 2015. Following a 1-month data collection at all participating hospitals, a transfusion algorithm incorporating point-of-care hemostatic testing was sequentially implemented at 2 hospitals at a time in 1-month intervals, with the implementation order randomly assigned. No other aspects of care were modified. The primary outcome was red blood cell transfusion from surgery to postoperative day 7. Other outcomes included transfusion of other blood products, major bleeding, and major complications. The analysis adjusted for secular time trends, within-hospital clustering, and patient-level risk factors. All outcomes and analyses were prespecified before study initiation. Results: Among the 7402 patients studied, 3555 underwent surgery during the control phase and 3847 during the intervention phase. Overall, 3329 (45.0%) received red blood cells, 1863 (25.2%) received platelets, 1645 (22.2%) received plasma, and 394 (5.3%) received cryoprecipitate. Major bleeding occurred in 1773 (24.1%) patients, and major complications occurred in 740 (10.2%) patients. The trial intervention reduced rates of red blood cell transfusion (adjusted relative risk, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-0.98; P=0.02; number needed to treat, 24.7), platelet transfusion (relative risk, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.87; P<0.001; number needed to treat, 16.7), and major bleeding (relative risk, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-0.94; P=0.004; number needed to treat, 22.6), but had no effect on other blood product transfusions or major complications. Conclusions: Implementation of point-of-care hemostatic testing within the context of an integrated transfusion algorithm reduces red blood cell transfusions, platelet transfusions, and major bleeding following cardiac surgery. Our findings support the broader adoption of point-of-care hemostatic testing into clinical practice. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02200419.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Karkouti, K., Callum, J., Wijeysundera, D. N., Rao, V., Crowther, M., Grocott, H. P., … Waters, T. (2016). Point-of-Care Hemostatic Testing in Cardiac Surgery. Circulation, 134(16), 1152–1162. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.116.023956

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘240481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

36%

Researcher 3

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

18%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 13

76%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

12%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

6%

Engineering 1

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 12

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0