Comparing predictive decision rules in postoperative CEA monitoring

38Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To evaluate the usefulness of serial postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assays, seven previously published decision rules for predicting tumor recurrence were compared retrospectively using CEA values from 214 patients followed 36 to 120 months after surgery for colorectal carcinoma. Decision rules employing cutoff values to predict tumor recurrence were found inadequate for the asymptomatic patient. This attenuation of prognostic usefulness appeared attributable to inadequacies of CEA assays for predicting late recurrences. From these analyses, elevated CEA results without other objective evidence might be insufficient to justify second‐look surgery. In addition, late recurring tumors tended not to cause elevated CEA levels. Copyright © 1986 American Cancer Society

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Denstman, F., Rosen, L., Khubchandani, I. T., Sheets, J. A., Stasik, J. J., & Riether, R. D. (1986). Comparing predictive decision rules in postoperative CEA monitoring. Cancer, 58(9), 2089–2095. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19861101)58:9<2089::AID-CNCR2820580921>3.0.CO;2-W

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free