The hatred of speech and the poetics of silence

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this chapter, I look at the case study of the contemporary poet Robert Grenier, in addition to a constellation of influences, especially Charles Olson and Larry Eigner, to examine how John Cage's conception of silence was modified by US poets associated with the Language writing movement. I will return, in particular, to Grenier's 1971 essay "On Speech", widely regarded as one of the most important theoretical statements of its milieu. In that essay, Grenier expresses a hatred of speech-where speech is understood both as an arrogation of the metaphysics of the subject, and as the grounding of meaning in intersubjective communication. This hatred of speech, I argue, inevitably leads Grenier to a graphic practice that intends to disrupt the readability of the poem, preventing it from being read-out-loud. I explore how this mode of silent reception-which is based on a slow, contemplative reading-disrupts the boundary between literature and art, reading and seeing, and recasts poetry as an art of silence as a notation of experience, rather than an art of sound as a notation of speech.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gould, T. (2022). The hatred of speech and the poetics of silence. In Silence and its Derivatives: Conversations Across Disciplines (pp. 199–213). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06523-1_10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free