Libertad Negativa, Autonomia Personal Y Constitucion

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

I inquire about the existence and limits of a moral principle of non-interference with privacy, such that should be constitutionally sanctioned. I evaluate various alternatives of conceptualization and assessment of its ground: Personal autonomy. Those who refuse its value will have defl ationary conceptions of noninterference. But valuing it does not involve a single mode of conceiving it. I assess a broad formulation that is not committed to any conception. Then I present Frankfurt/Dworkińs and Raz's conceptions. For all of them I highlight the consequences that follow concerning the delimitation of the scope of negative freedom, offer a wording of the warranty consistent with each posture and contrast it with hard cases.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Iosa, J. (2017). Libertad Negativa, Autonomia Personal Y Constitucion. Revista Chilena de Derecho, 44(2), 495–518. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34372017000200495

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free