Near-infrared spectroscopy versus transcranial doppler-based monitoring in carotid endarterectomy

13Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Proper monitoring of cerebral perfusion during carotid artery surgery is crucial for determining if a s hunt is n eeded. We c ompared the safety a nd r eliability o f near-infrared spectroscopy ( NIRS) w ith transcranial Doppler (TCD) for cerebral monitoring. Methods: This single-center, retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) using selective shunt-based TCD or NIRS at Daegu Catholic University Medical Center from November 2009 to June 2016. Postoperative complications were the primary outcome, and the distribution of risk factors between the 2 groups was compared. Results: The medical records of 74 patients (45 TCD, 29 NIRS) were reviewed. The demographic characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. One TCD patient died within the 30-day postoperative period. Postoperative stroke (n=4, p=0.15) and neurologic complications (n=10, p=0.005) were only reported in the TCD group. Shunt usage was 44.4% and 10.3% in the TCD and NIRS groups, respectively (p=0.002). Conclusion: NIRS-based selective shunting during CEA seems to be safe and reliable for monitoring cerebral perfusion in terms of postoperative stroke and neurologic symptoms. It also reduces unnecessary shunt usage.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cho, J. W., & Jang, J. S. (2017). Near-infrared spectroscopy versus transcranial doppler-based monitoring in carotid endarterectomy. Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 50(6), 448–452. https://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2017.50.6.448

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free